Know who is credited

Authors and Reviewers

Fitness Instructor AI Editorial Team is the publishing credit used on the project's written resources. Current editorial preparation uses AI assistance. Specialist human review remains open.

Read the byline, source references and any reviewer statement together. Each tells you something different about the page in front of you.

Editorial credit Reviewer status Report a correction

Updated: October 31, 2026

A person writing in an open notebook beside two adjustable dumbbells on an exercise mat. — Illustrative stock photograph. NanciSantos / Envato.

The editorial credit

Fitness Instructor AI Editorial Team

This name identifies the project's editorial publishing credit. AI tools assist the current research, drafting, worked examples and page checks. The credit does not provide a personal biography or professional qualification.

For example, the nutrition-label guide identifies its AI-assisted preparation and links to the material behind its explanations. That lets you follow the claim back to its source while keeping the site's writing credit visible.

The Editorial Policy describes the standards for preparing and checking the material. This page identifies the kinds of contributors and credits a reader may encounter.

Current status

Professional reviewer status

Specialist human review remains open

No named doctor, registered dietitian or certified trainer is listed here as a professional reviewer. The current training-technique, nutrition and safety material still has specialist human review open.

An AI-assisted source check, a working calculator or a citation should not be read as an unstated professional sign-off.

A professional review credit should identify the person, their relevant qualification and what they reviewed. Look for an explicit statement on the individual page. If that information is absent, do not assume that a specialist has reviewed it.

Read each role clearly

Four credits, four different roles

One page can credit several kinds of work without assigning them the same responsibility.

What to look for beside a credit
Credit	What it identifies	What to check
Editorial byline	The publishing credit for the written resource.	The AI-assistance disclosure and the page's update date.
Professional reviewer	A named person who reviewed a defined part of the content.	Their relevant qualification and the scope of the stated review.
Research citation	The authors of an external paper or reference.	Whether that source supports the particular statement being made.
Image credit	The creator or licensed source of a photograph or illustration.	The caption and the image's role in the explanation.

A researcher in a reference list is credited for that research. A reviewer credit would need to state that the person reviewed our page. Coach personas, illustrated avatars and stock-photo models are not named human reviewers.

Help improve a page

Report a correction

Send a citation problem, factual concern or calculator issue to the site's published contact: [email protected].

Include the page URL, the section or result you are referring to, and what you think needs changing. A link to supporting evidence is useful when you have one. That keeps the report tied to a specific issue.

The address is provided as a contact for the project. It does not identify the recipient as a professional reviewer of the site's articles.

Follow the attribution

Sources and further reading

NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: How to Evaluate Health Information on the Internet explains why site responsibility, sources and reviewer credentials deserve separate attention.
Editorial Policy describes the project's preparation and correction standards.
Privacy Policy includes the site's published contact information.